|
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your valuable feedback, this feature will be tracked by case 105589. The Product Management team will evaluate and decide how to proceed, we will keep you posted. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I need to create a driver connector for GIAI (CheckPOint) using a snmp context like this : snmpwalk -v 3 -a MD5 -A 'foo' -u fish -l authNoPriv -n ctxname_vsid2 device_name OID the context id can be get with this OID : 1.3.6.1.4.1.2620.1.16.22.1.1.1 but how i can modify the python object : snmpinfo to add the context arguments ? if you don't use a context, you will poll only the main box appliance, not the VSX. Thanks for any response. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your post. For this specific request, would it be possible that you to submit a ticket or send an email to support@netbraintech.com? This way, our support engineers will be able to track the case and help you more efficiently. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first feature request is to provide support in these forums for a separate channel structure. With the current single channel, it can make it troublesome to find things and provide clarity on reading areas of interest.
A good example is the creation of a Feature Request section. With this FR method being part of a single thread, it is not conducive to constructive feedback and discussion on each FR submitted. For example, I am about to add a second post to this thread, which other users may want to discuss, giving differing opinions, adding support or suggestions to implement. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The user taggin feature within the various Note popouts, notably the Runbook entries is really useful and we recommend this feature to everyone we demonstrate NetBrain to.
There is a Free Text Runbook action, which is a great method to allow a user to collate their investigations into a single thread within the runbook process. However, it is not possible to @other users, which I feel is something which would be of benefit. For example, if a 1st tier engineer has processed a 3 step runbook, they could add within each action's Note section their findings for each and maybe @ a colleague. What I feel would be better here, is that this 1st tier engineer adds the single Free Text action and writes up there findings to date i.e. @BobSmith - I have performed the first triage analysis and as you can see from the above data collected I am not seeing anything of concern. I am handing over to you to continue the investigation Thanks Mark |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your valuable suggestions. we are in the process of building a new forum and will take the Feature Request section into consideration. Thanks, Gerry |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your detail description of the suggestion. I submitted a Feature Request on behalf of you under your account in our ticket system and will let you know once it is implemented. case#00108889 Thanks, Gerry |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to request that NetBrain find some way to "select all" when we have to select many nodes at one time. As an example, If you Select Fine Tune and then select Unknown IP's, I have over 11K of these that I have to either rediscover or remove from table. Currently, I have to select the top and scroll down 11,000 lines to the bottom and his shift/click. It would be great if there was a "Select All" button to do this. Would this be possible?
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
We created the case 109460 for your request. NetBrain Product Management team will evaluate your request and decide how to proceed, we will keep you posted. |